How does regime type influence military success according to the provided information?

The assertion that democracies tend to be better at alliances is supported by the understanding of how democratic states often operate within the international system. Democracies typically promote cooperative relationships and are more likely to engage in multilateral diplomacy. This is reflected in their willingness to form strategic alliances based on shared values, mutual interests, and adherence to international norms, which can facilitate a more unified and effective military response during conflicts.

Furthermore, the social and participatory nature of democracies encourages inclusive decision-making processes that can bolster public support for military engagements. The transparency and accountability mechanisms that are inherent to democratic governance are likely to foster more stable and resilient alliances, as allies can trust that each state will uphold its commitments.

This approach contrasts with autocracies, which may prioritize unilateral actions and not engage as deeply in alliances due to political motivations and a lack of accountability. While there could be instances where autocracies achieve military success, the cooperative spirit and shared democratic values often enhance the effectiveness of alliances formed by democratic states, particularly in coalition warfare scenarios.