Which of the following best describes the approach of realpolitik?

The approach of realpolitik is characterized primarily by its focus on pragmatic solutions and practical considerations rather than ideological beliefs or moral imperatives. This perspective emphasizes the importance of realism in political decision-making, where the relationship between the interests of states and the pursuit of power takes precedence over abstract theories or comprehensive ideologies.

In practice, realpolitik suggests that leaders should engage in practical negotiations and understand that political action should be based on achievable outcomes, often prioritizing national interests and security over ethical concerns or the pursuit of lofty ideals. The emphasis on pragmatic solutions allows for flexibility in foreign policy, enabling states to adapt to changing circumstances and to work with a variety of partners as needed, rather than being constrained by strict ideological positions.

The other approaches involve distinct priorities that do not align with the core tenets of realpolitik. For example, relying on diplomacy and cooperation at all costs suggests a more idealistic approach than what realpolitik would endorse. Prioritizing military actions over diplomatic solutions skews the balance by underestimating the importance of negotiation within realpolitik. Finally, favoring ethical considerations in decision-making points towards a normative perspective that is not central to the realpolitik philosophy, which tends to sideline ethical imperatives in favor of pragmatic and strategic outcomes.